A Midsummer Nights Dream by William Shakespeare - Free Essay Example

Whats not better than reading and watching fairies and parents getting in the way of true love? Who doesnt like seeing people get turned into donkeys? Everyone loves a good fight and a happy ending right? In every play there is a debate with the book and movie. One is always gonna be better the question is always gonna be why? The real question is what makes a story a story? Every play or story is based on a order. Thats what makes the story make sense, its what puts it in place. Now this play is different because it was written in a different time, a different generation, and a unique language. Every new part was called act. For example, the beginning starts off with a love story feud in act 1 scene 1. Everything is in order first come the love story with a couple of hiccups then someone getting turned into a donkey and a battle between gods and somewhere in the story someone is writing a play within a play. I know your thinking how can this all make sense in one single play but it was written by Shakespeare and everyone knows he has a very unique mind and brilliant ideas. On the other hand you could just watch the movie. Now thats the thing with a book theres always gonna be a movie but who really knows whats better. Even though there on the same thing there is always gonna be a difference between the two. For instance the play is always gonna have more detail than a book and thats just a fact. It would always use more feeling and give a little more when it comes down to how someone feels. A movie does show emotion dont get me wrong but writing give more of an extra effect. For example when hermia and Lysander were in the feud with her father about marrying Demetrius I got more feeling in the play than the movie. Of course they couldnt say everything Shakespeare wrote down for the play because truth is it was so much, so they just summarized it. Though they do have a minor differences between them it doesnt change the fact that they both are very similar because its still on the same thing. A book can use more detail and be better in so many ways but for me Im more of a visual person. Anyone that read A Midsummer Nights Dream would know its not short. We read it as a class so can you imagine how long that took. I like how plays or any story gives us more but I like to see more than to read it. Its just amazes me how books can take up to days to read but a movie just takes a couple of hours. Actually seeing someone turn into a donkey was better than reading about it. Watching Lysander hermia true love fall in love with Helena over a potion would always be better to visual see it than to read about it. This doesnt mean the play was bad it just mean Im just like the rest of society Ill rather watch a movie than to read. But it comes down to what was A Midsummer Nights Dream really about? This play was a comedy but came with a little truth and happy ending. Every love story will have people not supporting the relationship. Just like love stories there is drama but nothing that cant be solved. Last but not least a happy ending there was things around it like fairies and plays and fight with an Amazon queen. But it all started with a love story.

Law on Terror - Free Essay Example

Brief : 191325 Delivery Date : 7/12/2006 Title: Counter Terrorism and Civil Liberties Brief Description a) Anti terror legislative tools (in Britain) and their compatibility with the national and international Human Rights regimes b) Rights and duties of the government in relation to protecting citizens as well as the fundamental human rights c) Is it really justifiable to compromise on the core democratic values while preventing potential terror threats? STANDARD DISSERTATION OUTLINE REQUESTED. DISSERTATION OUTLINE 1. Proposed Dissertation Title à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Human Rights and the Law on Terrorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  or simply à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The Law on Terrorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  (à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Law on Terrorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  chimes neatly and appositely in this context with popular phrase à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The War on Terrorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ) 2. Outline Research Objectives and Methodology The interface between counter-terror laws and the nation and int ernational human rights matrices is of great contemporary importance and the subject of a huge amount of recent comment and analysis. As a consequence it is argued that that the internet should be utilised as the predominant information resource for this dissertation. The sheer scope and detail of information readily available on the internet relating to the law on terrorism is unrivalled by any traditional library. That said it is prudent to treat internet sources with a healthy caution, in particular in the technical field of the relationship between human rights and criminal law. Internet sources are of variable reliability material should be evaluated for credibility before used. It is a good policy to seek out secondary corroborative sources and follow up cited footnotes. Research in this field will also be facilitated by the use of a law library. The newspaper and periodical sections will offer contemporary analysis and other electronic data gateways and engines such as Westlaw UK, Lexis-Nexis[1] and Lawtel[2] will provide other pathways to information gathering. For example a AOL Google-powered search of the internet using the phrase à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“law on terrorism and human rightsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  returned 42,900 hits on United Kingdom websites and 1.06 million hits worldwide. Only a fraction of these will ultimately prove useful but such a search is a good starting point to identify research resources and options. The top rated UK hits include: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Terrorism v human rights: Where do you draw the line?à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ : https://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,27969-2091830,00.html; à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Terrorismà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ : https://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/2-terrorism/index.shtml; à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Terrorism Human Rightsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ : https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications_media/speeches/2006/sp191006.htm à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“QA: Terrorism lawsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ : https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4715478.stm These hits were all drawn from the first page of hits and offer a useful example of the breadth of material available, with the first hit hosted by the Times newspaper, the second by the Liberty, the civil liberties pressure group, the third being a speech by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips, and the fourth provided by the BBC. Care must be taken to ensure that all resources utilised must advance at least one of the three identified research priorities of this work, namely: a) Anti terror legislative tools (in Britain) and their compatibility with the national and international Human Rights regimes b) Rights and duties of the government in relation to protecting citizens as well as the fundamental human rights c) Is it really justifiable to compromise on the core democratic values while preventing potential terror threats? 3. Contents (Draft) 1.Title Page 2. Contents Page 3. Summary and acknowledgements (250-450 words)[3] 4. Introduction, including political context and socio-legal definitions of key concepts: eg human rights[4] and terrorism[5]. (500-750 words) 5. Descriptive discussion of UK anti-terror framework. This will include, inter alia, comment on: the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005[6]; the Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001[7]; the Terrorism Act 2000. (800-1200 words) 6. Critical analysis of the UK law on terror and points of conflict and tension with human rights law, national and international.[8] This will include in particular, comment on the key issues raised by the Human Rights Act 1998[9] and European Convention of Human Rights (1950)[10]. This will also include consideration of recent case law directly on point such as SSHD v JJ Ors[11] regarding control orders and the right a fair trial under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights which prohibits indefinite detention without trial.[12] Another important case is A (FC) and others (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004)[13], where it was held that indefinite detention of foreign terror suspects is in compatible with the 1998 Human Rights Act and in contravention of the European Convention on Human Rights. See also: Chahal v United Kingdom (1996)[14] which saw an individual successfully claim a breach of his human rights under Articles 3 and 5 of the European Convention. (2000 words) 7.Socio-legal analysis of the delicate balance to be struck between the protection of society and the individual from acts of terrorism and the preservation of human rights. Precis: carrying the fundamental message that terrorism is a serious threat to the state and society, but to mitigate human rights would be to give terror groups a palpable victory. The ultimate challenge for human rights law is that it must be applied blindly and with an even hand whether the subject is a potential victim or an actual protagonist of an offence of terrorism. This task is all the more difficult in the aftermath of a terror attack, but it is all the more important in that context. Respect for human rights must b e viewed as an indispensable component of the United Kingdomà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s democratic society, not as a concession to do-gooders or a disposable luxury in times of emergency, strife or pressure. (2000 words) 8.Analysis of the subjugation of democracy in the face of terror. (2000 words) Precis: It would certainly be easier, at least from the perspective of the state, to police the threat posed by terrorism in such a way as to exclude the concept of human rights entirely, by imposing civil restrictions, and unlimited powers of investigation, detention and punishment. That said, it is submitted that just because such a policy would be advantageous from the point of view of law enforcement, it most definitely is not necessarily the most appropriate tack to take for the good of society. To respond by introducing the totalitarian policy of a police state would be to strike at the very heart of the democracy that terrorism itself is designed to attack. In the aftermath of terror ou trages such as 9/11 or 7/7 there is a strong temptation to impose draconian laws. However, mistakes will occur. Grave injustices committed by the state will follow atrocities committed by terror groups and the moral authority of society will be forfeit. 9.Personal Commentary (1000 words) 10. Conclusions (500 words) 11. Endnotes (if used) 12. Bibliography 4. Key References A great many references are available. A list of core references is provided below: Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2001/20010024.htm Human Rights Act 1998: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm European Convention of Human Rights (1950): https://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm Human Rights Watch World Reports, see eg: https://www.hrw.org/wr2k3/us.html. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), United Nations Gen eral Assembly: https://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html 5. Supervisor or Proposed Supervisor Details To be supplied by client. THE END WORD COUNT : 1251 (excluding footnotes) BIBLIOGRAPHY Carlos Nino, The Ethics of Human Rights, (1993), Clarendon Press, Oxford, p.10. European Convention of Human Rights (1950): https://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2001/20010024.htm Terrorism Act 2000: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2000/00011b.htm Human Rights Act 1998: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm Human Rights Watch World Reports, see eg: https://www.hrw.org/wr2k3/us.html. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), United Nations General Assembly: https://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html Lexis-Nexis Lawtel Westlaw UK Cases as footnoted, dr awn from original law reports. 1 Footnotes [1] Lexis-Nexis, is a well-established full-text legal database based in the United States, but it has carried extensive British and Commonwealth data since 1980 and therefore it can usefully be exploited in this study in providing the law on terrorism and legal context on human rights issues. The Nexis section carries a vast body of non-legal data including news wires, newspapers and periodicals in a broad range of subjects and this would be useful in deriving analysis on the law on terrorism and civil liberties issues from an eclectic variety of sources. [2] See for links and comment: https://ials.sas.ac.uk/library/eservice/westlaw.htm [3] Guidelines only, based on a standard dissertation length of 10,000 words. [4] See eg: Human rights may be conceptualised as a matrix of inalienable universal rights possessed by all human beings by simple virtue of their humanity. Such rights are enjoyed regardless of a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s defining characteristics, such as ethnic ity, gender or nationality, and are founded on base principles of justice within society (researcherà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s own definition). For further comment see: See inter alia: Carlos Nino, The Ethics of Human Rights, (1993), Clarendon Press, Oxford, p.10. [5] Legal definition provided by the Terrorism Act 2000: https://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2000/00011b.htm [6] https://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm. [7] https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2001/20010024.htm. [8] Could be split into two separate chapters national/international. [9] https://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm. [10] https://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm. [11] [2006] EWCA Civ 1141. [12] Travis, Alan, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Reids curfew orders on six terror suspects are illegal, say judges,à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ The Guardian, August 2 2006. [13] [2004] UKHL 56. [14] 22414/93 [1996] ECHR 54 (15 November 1996).